Best Game (Sigs)

Timeline from cod2, engine from cod4 and crappyness from cod3 = cod 5

Xavior wrote:Timeline from cod2, engine from cod4 and crappyness from cod3 = cod 5

yep...
cod3 wasnt good as cod2 and now i think that its teh same story with cod4 and cod5 but the "gap" this time is not that big.. tahst how i see it

^^did you say cod5 has same story as cod4?

CoD5 = WWII story of the Japanese fights, the Polish/Russian attack on Berlin and Britain somewhere else.

CoD2 was Russians - Berlin
Americans - Pointe Du Hoc and D-Day
British - Alamein
Joint - ehh not got far ...prolly some rescue mission

CoD5 wont be anything like cod3

no.. we said cod5 is been placed historically as cod2 (meanly ww2) -.-'
an ye i agree that it wont be that mess called cod3 but i doubt it will be better than cod4

With cod its always ww2 or modern what about ww1

WW1
Sit in a trench half the game. Hear a whistle, go over the top, get mowed down.
Game over.

~ATOMIC~ wrote:With cod its always ww2 or modern what about ww1

Considering only 1 game was modern....

World War I is bullocks to make a game of. Most people don't even know why WWI existed.

I think it started when someone murdered Franz Ferdinand

Ferdinand murdered by serbia guy, big fight between allied and central powers

That's how it started, not why it started.
France revánche 1870 against Germany, Troubles in the Balkans; Bosnian Crisis 1908, Balkan Wars 1912/13, Morroccan Crises '05, '11 - French/Ger/Brit angst. Naval race 1905+, Failures of Weltpolitik, German aggression, German domestic problems, desire for war in Britain, Replacement of Bismarck containment policies, erratic Kaiser etc but to name a few.
The assassination of FF was only but a mere trigger, an excuse for Austria-Hungary to declare war on Serbia, as revenge for 1912/13. They knew they had German backing, and that Russia would start war, so effectively they knew it'd be a Europe-wide war. I mean, Britain's 'right to protect the neutrality of Belgium' was an excuse, under most other circumstances, it wouldn't have been upheld. So Boomlala and Tony may be speaking German otherwise.......

ANYWAY, WW1 would only have a few decent battles for a game, like Loos or Mons.
Remember, tanks didn't even exist until like 1917, and even then they were primitive.

Camper sind auch gute Blaeser.

Matthew wrote:France revánche 1870 against Germany, Troubles in the Balkans; Bosnian Crisis 1908, Balkan Wars 1912/13, Morroccan Crises '05, '11 - French/Ger/Brit angst. Naval race 1905+, Failures of Weltpolitik, German aggression, German domestic problems, desire for war in Britain, Replacement of Bismarck containment policies, erratic Kaiser etc but to name a few.
The assassination of FF was only but a mere trigger, an excuse for Austria-Hungary to declare war on Serbia, as revenge for 1912/13. They knew they had German backing, and that Russia would start war, so effectively they knew it'd be a Europe-wide war. I mean, Britain's 'right to protect the neutrality of Belgium' was an excuse, under most other circumstances, it wouldn't have been upheld.

Yeah, I bet you knew that ^^

been studying it for the last 4 weeks

still they should make ww1 but if you lose it changes the whole story line nad if u win it will carry on with a different one

still they should make ww1 but if you lose it changes the whole story line nad if u win it will carry on with a different one

Wtf are you saying?

Say if you playing some game and you lost that level you would continue on a different story line.

Then it wouldnt be ww1 would it? You dumbshit.

lmao

The point of these games is, you take place of a certain soldier, you experience the war through their eyes, they die aka you lose then their died, you cant carry on.

Have you even played a game in what ive been saying its much better then the ones now.

You still miss the fucking point you idiot.

ITS NOT WW1 IF IT DOESNT FOLLOW THE STORY OF WW1

No stop right there yr missing the point half of the cods are a made up story anyway

...

No, most of the battles in COD occur, or contribute to another battle. You're objectives may be slightly fictional, but it's a decent idea of what men had to do during those battles; defending houses, dynamiting artillery guns and clearing out bunkers.
In that sense it's not fiction. All those battles contributed to the way the war finished, when it finished and how it finished. That is strictly followed in COD; the action of COD may not be, but the storyline is. Your death in COD doesn't affect how the War goes. The allies dont suddenly lose the war if u die.

~ATOMIC~ wrote:No stop right there yr missing the point half of the cods are a made up story anyway

So the Germans raiding Paris, Russians raiding Berlin didnt occur?

Wow kid, learn history.