What's up with me avatar?

C2G Shadman133 wrote:

E-Nig wrote:me?

My family's irish

Then why do you live in Scotland?

Are you fucking stupid?


They emigrated to Scotland.

E-Nig wrote:

C2G Shadman133 wrote:

E-Nig wrote:me?

My family's irish

Then why do you live in Scotland?

Are you fucking stupid?

.

is that even a question?

rhetorical

Cleaning the cache helps hulianus. =) I didn't see it either until I cleaned it.

E-Nig wrote:

C2G Shadman133 wrote:

E-Nig wrote:me?

My family's irish

Then why do you live in Scotland?

Are you fucking stupid?


They immigrated to Scotland.

Fixed. Next time check your spelling before asking someone if they are stupid.

C2G Shadman133 wrote:

E-Nig wrote:

C2G Shadman133 wrote:

E-Nig wrote:me?

My family's irish

Then why do you live in Scotland?

Are you fucking stupid?


They immigrated to Scotland.

Fixed. Next time check your spelling before asking someone if they are stupid.

Check your Irish-Scottish history before asking mugtard questions

Besides, emigrate isn't a wrong word to use in this case.

Actually it is the word used by everybody.

So next time, how about you actually use wikipedia for good, you fucking tossbag.

The correct word is Immigrate hence the term Immigrants...

It is both correct, immigrate however looks to be more natural, since one immigrates to a country, and emigrates from a country.

Emigration is the act of going out of a country, immigration the act of going in the country.

Now I don't know the Irish-Scottish history, but I presume Irish people went to Scotland. Then immigrated is the more natural word, but emigrated could be used aswell. When immigrated is used, the writer wants to 'accentuate' the act of going into Scotland. When emigrated is used, the writer thinks the act of leaving Ireland is more important or more on topic than entering Scotland.

oh Boom....wtf?

That's at least how I see the conflict.

Yeah boom, what tha fack! ^_^

ok I mean for 16 ur smart and I don't like that

Why not?

Cuz Huni is stupid duh....

Boomlala wrote:It is both correct, immigrate however looks to be more natural, since one immigrates to a country, and emigrates from a country.

Emigration is the act of going out of a country, immigration the act of going in the country.

Now I don't know the Irish-Scottish history, but I presume Irish people went to Scotland. Then immigrated is the more natural word, but emigrated could be used aswell. When immigrated is used, the writer wants to 'accentuate' the act of going into Scotland. When emigrated is used, the writer thinks the act of leaving Ireland is more important or more on topic than entering Scotland.

Emigrated is the correct fucking word. Put the fucking dictionary down, and go outside.

C2G Shadman133 wrote:The correct word is Immigrate hence the term Immigrants...

It is emigrate.



People refer to the people who EMIGRATED from Ireland to Scotland and England as Emigrants


And why?

The Great Famine of course, and the search for more work.

E-Nig wrote:

Boomlala wrote:It is both correct, immigrate however looks to be more natural, since one immigrates to a country, and emigrates from a country.

Emigration is the act of going out of a country, immigration the act of going in the country.

Now I don't know the Irish-Scottish history, but I presume Irish people went to Scotland. Then immigrated is the more natural word, but emigrated could be used aswell. When immigrated is used, the writer wants to 'accentuate' the act of going into Scotland. When emigrated is used, the writer thinks the act of leaving Ireland is more important or more on topic than entering Scotland.

Emigrated is the correct fucking word. Put the fucking dictionary down, and go outside.

Go back to school

C2G Shadman133 wrote:

E-Nig wrote:

Boomlala wrote:It is both correct, immigrate however looks to be more natural, since one immigrates to a country, and emigrates from a country.

Emigration is the act of going out of a country, immigration the act of going in the country.

Now I don't know the Irish-Scottish history, but I presume Irish people went to Scotland. Then immigrated is the more natural word, but emigrated could be used aswell. When immigrated is used, the writer wants to 'accentuate' the act of going into Scotland. When emigrated is used, the writer thinks the act of leaving Ireland is more important or more on topic than entering Scotland.

Emigrated is the correct fucking word. Put the fucking dictionary down, and go outside.

Go back to school

Im still in school dipshit.

Emigration - Same as Immigration except from the Point of View of the country of origin.

Therefore the IRISH EMIGRATED.

Boomlala is right. Both immigrate and emigrate are suitable words to use in this case. The thing is just as BoomBoom described it.

Immigrate means that someone moves in some country from another one, and emigrate means someone moves out of his former country.
Thus I would see it as you first emigrate your country to immigrate another one.

Whatever the case is it's idiotic to start whining about grammatical error when you can't come up with a real argument after someone has proven their point to be valid.

C2G Shadman133 wrote:

E-Nig wrote:

Boomlala wrote:It is both correct, immigrate however looks to be more natural, since one immigrates to a country, and emigrates from a country.

Emigration is the act of going out of a country, immigration the act of going in the country.

Now I don't know the Irish-Scottish history, but I presume Irish people went to Scotland. Then immigrated is the more natural word, but emigrated could be used aswell. When immigrated is used, the writer wants to 'accentuate' the act of going into Scotland. When emigrated is used, the writer thinks the act of leaving Ireland is more important or more on topic than entering Scotland.

Emigrated is the correct fucking word. Put the fucking dictionary down, and go outside.

Go back to school

Lol I had to laugh at how fucking stupid and irrelevant this 'comeback' was

Like yours are any better?

Well for a start I don't roll ad hominem, red herring, and poisoning the well all into one 4 word disgrace of a comeback. Secondly, the only reason I seem to slam every post you make is because, tbh, they're either statistically wrong, horribly opinionated when it's clearly not necessary or personal attacks on an author making a valid argument. In fact, most of yours are all 3.

With an exception to the rule for me of course, I LOVE personal attacks; but only against idiots like you who think they can shit all over someone with irrelevant remarks that highlight why you're so overwhelmingly hated.
You seem to base all of your arguments off poor statistical evidence, and when someone corrects you or tells you you're wrong, you go apeshit with donkey comments such as 'go back to school'. At least Enigma contextualised his insult.

Ergo, to answer your question, yes they are.

Hahaha youre funny kid.